Regulating the market for human eggs

Bioethics 15 (1):1–25 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay provides a rationale for a regulated market for human oocytes. Although the commodification of human oocytes raises important moral concerns, these concerns do not justify laws banning commerce in human eggs. Given the burgeoning ART industry and the growing oocyte market, the most prudent course of action is to develop regulations for the human oocyte market that are designed to protect and promote important social values, such as health, safety, liberty, and respect for human life. Other responses, such as banning the sale of eggs altogether or allowing donors to be compensated only for their services, would either create a black market or would lead to corruption and abuse. Society still needs to debate specific rules and policies that should govern the human egg market, but further discussion of that important task is best left to legislative bodies and other commentators.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
95 (#177,613)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

DNA Patents and Human Dignity.David B. Resnik - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):152-165.
Oocytes for sale?Lori Gruen - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):285–308.
Patents on Human-Animal Chimeras and Threats to Human Dignity.David B. Resnik - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):35-36.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references