David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3):245-260 (1999)
This study discusses the results of a survey of 1,800 articles published in American medical journals from 1985--1996. The study finds 9% of these articles reported research that uses only male subjects to examine medical conditions that affect both sexes; the ratio of research on female to male conditions among these articles was greater than 5:1; but 76.5% of the articles reported research that includes both male and female subjects. The study also discusses evidence that sex biases against women (and men) are decreasing. This study also offers some possible psychological, institutional, medical, and economic explanations of the sex biases in medical research published in American journals, and discusses some policy implications of sex biases in medical research. The study concludes by urging others to conduct more empirical research on sex biases in medical research.
|Keywords||sex biases subject selection medical research NIH policies|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Douglas C. Frechtling & Soyoung Boo (2012). On the Ethics of Management Research: An Exploratory Investigation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 106 (2):149-160.
Pascal Borry, Paul Schotsmans & Kris Dierickx (2006). How International is Bioethics? A Quantitative Retrospective Study. BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-6.
D. M. Randall & A. M. Gibson (1990). Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6):457 - 471.
Anthony D. Miyazaki & Kimberly A. Taylor (2008). Researcher Interaction Biases and Business Ethics Research: Respondent Reactions to Researcher Characteristics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 81 (4):779 - 795.
Sergio Sismondo & Mathieu Doucet (2009). Publication Ethics and the Ghost Management of Medical Publication. Bioethics 24 (6):273-283.
Murray Sabrin (2002). A Ranking of the Most Productive Business Ethics Scholars: A Five-Year Study. Journal of Business Ethics 36 (4):355 - 379.
Robert L. Klitzman, Kelly Kleinert, Hoda Rifai-Bashjawish & L. E. U. Shiung (2011). The Reporting of Irb Review in Journal Articles Presenting Hiv Research Conducted in the Developing World. Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):161-169.
Jessica S. Ancker & Annette Flanagin (2007). A Comparison of Conflict of Interest Policies at Peer-Reviewed Journals in Different Scientific Disciplines. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):147-157.
Wendy Rogers & Angela Ballantyne (2008). When Is Sex-Specific Research Appropriate? International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):36 - 57.
Ronald M. Davis, Anne Victoria Neale & Joseph C. Monsur (2003). Medical Journals' Conflicts of Interest in the Publication of Book Reviews. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):471-483.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #160,567 of 1,911,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #50,323 of 1,911,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?