What are we to accept, and what are we to reject, while saving truth from paradox? [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 147 (3):433 - 443 (2010)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy of Religion   Philosophy of Mind   Epistemology   Logic   Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,570
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Greg Restall (2005). Multiple Conclusions. In Petr Hájek, Luis Valdés-Villanueva & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. College Publications

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Tore Fjetland Øgaard (2016). Paths to Triviality. Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (3):237-276.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

28 ( #151,858 of 1,938,467 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #449,299 of 1,938,467 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.