What are we to accept, and what are we to reject

Abstract

I’m delighted to have the opportunity to respond to Hartry Field’s Saving Truth From Paradox [3]. This is a wonderful book: it’s clear and precise, interesting and engaging, and deep and important all at once. Truth and the paradoxes..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Replacing truth.Kevin Scharp - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (6):606 – 621.
Facts and Truth-Making.Michael Pendlebury - 2010 - Topoi 29 (2):137-145.
Rejecting ethical deflationism.Jacob Ross - 2006 - Ethics 116 (4):742-768.
Saving truth from paradox.Hartry H. Field - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Deflationism and Paradox.Jc Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.) - 2005 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Models and the locus of their truth.Uskali Mäki - 2011 - Synthese 180 (1):47 - 63.
A Gunk-Friendly MaxCon.Gregory Fowler - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):611 – 627.
The pervasive paradox of tense.Heather Dyke - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):103-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
27 (#504,354)

6 months
1 (#1,028,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Greg Restall
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references