Human is what is born of a human: Personhood, rationality, and an european convention

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):181 – 194 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the course of its preparation, the 1997 convention on human rights and biomedicine adopted by the Council of Europe instigated a widespread debate. This article examines one of the core issues: the notion of the human being as depicted in the convention. It is argued that according to the convention, this being may exist in three different legal categories, namely 'human life', 'embryo', and 'personhood', each furnished with an inherent set of somewhat different rights, yet none of them clearly defined, thus leaving it to domestic law to regulate at what point a human being belongs to which category. While this approach is understandable from a political point of view, it creates a vicious circle, since law thereby has to define its own foundation and, in the case of the convention, to protect a being that it cannot define. It appears that this form of life is seen rather as a given entity, taking precedence over the interests of society and science, and its dignity and identity forming criteria for the subsequent systems of culture, simply because this life is human and nothing else. Thus, the convention approaches a natural law position.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A philosophical and critical analysis of the european convention of bioethics.Gilbert Hottois - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):133 – 146.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#322,999)

6 months
1 (#1,027,696)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references