David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (3):245 – 261 (2001)
Interactive technology assessment (iTA) provides an answer to the ethical problem of normative bias in evaluation research. This normative bias develops when relevant perspectives on the evaluand (the thing being evaluated) are neglected. In iTA this bias is overcome by incorporating different perspectives into the assessment. As a consequence, justification of decisions based on the assessment is provided by stakeholders having achieved agreement. In this article, agreement is identified with wide reflective equilibrium to show that it indeed has the potential of justifying decisions. We work out several conditions for this agreement to be achievable and just.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Neelke Doorn (2010). Applying Rawlsian Approaches to Resolve Ethical Issues: Inventory and Setting of a Research Agenda. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):127 - 143.
Neelke Doorn (2013). Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Model for Responsible Governance. NanoEthics 7 (1):29-43.
Elin Palm (2013). An Interactive Ethical Assessment of Surveillance‐Capable Software Within the Home‐Help Service Sector. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 11 (1):43-68.
Similar books and articles
Gert J. Van Der Wilt (1995). Empirical and Normative Aspects of Medical Technology Assessment. The Case of Reduced-Size Liver Transplantations with Living Donors. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (3).
K. Kappel (2006). The Meta-Justification of Reflective Equilibrium. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):131-147.
Ben Eggleston (2010). Practical Equilibrium: A Way of Deciding What to Think About Morality. Mind 119 (475):549 - 584.
G. Wilt (2004). Health Technology Assessment: Trying to Bring Empirical and Ethical Inquiry Together. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):195-206.
Gert Jan van der Wilt, Rob Reuzel & H. David Banta (2000). The Ethics of Assessing Health Technologies. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):101-113.
Edward Stein (2005). Wide Reflective Equilibrium as an Answer to an Objection to Moral Heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):561-562.
G. J. van Der Wilt (2004). Health Technology Assessment: Trying to Bring Empirical and Ethical Inquiry Together. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 2 (2-3):195-206.
Rob Reuzel (2004). Interactive Technology Assessment of Paediatric Cochlear Implantation. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):119-137.
Carson Strong (2010). Theoretical and Practical Problems with Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (2):123-140.
Rob P. B. Reuzel, Gert-Jan van Der Wilt, Henk A. M. J. ten Have & Pieter F. de Vries Robbé (1999). Reducing Normative Bias in Health Technology Assessment: Interactive Evaluation and Casuistry. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):255-263.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #454,007 of 1,100,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #304,128 of 1,100,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?