David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Lexington Books, Rowman and Littlefield (2012)
A battle over the politics of time is a major part of what is at stake in the differences between three competing currents of contemporary philosophy: analytic philosophy, post-structuralist philosophy, and phenomenological philosophy. Avowed or tacit philosophies of time define representatives of each of these groups and also guard against their potential interlocutors. However, by bringing the temporal differences between these philosophical trajectories to the fore, and showing both their methodological presuppositions and their ethico-political implications, this book begins a long overdue dialogue on their respective strengths and weaknesses. It argues that there are systemic temporal problems that afflict each, but especially the post-structuralist tradition and the analytic tradition. What is required is a “middle-way” that does not treat the living-present and the pragmatic temporality associated with bodily coping as an epiphenomenon to be explained away as either a transcendental illusion, or as a subjective/psychological experience that is not ultimately real.
|Keywords||time phenomenology poststructuralism politics methodology Deleuze Derrida analytic continental|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jack Reynolds (2012). Time, Philosophy and Chronopathologies. Parrhesia (15):64-80.
Jack Reynolds (2010). Time Out of Joint: Between Phenomenology and Poststructuralism. Parrhesia: A Critical Journal of Philosophy (9):55-64.
Jack Reynolds (2011). The Analytic/Continental Divide: A Contretemps? In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), The Antipodean Philosopher: Volume 1, Public Lectures in Australia and New Zealand. Rowman and Littlefield
Jack Reynolds (2004). Derrida and Deleuze on Time and the Future. Borderlands 3 (1):15.
Jack Reynolds (2006). Sadism and Masochism: A Symptomatology of Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Parrhesia 1 (1):15.
Jack Reynolds (2006). Negotiating the Non-Negotiable: Rawls, Derrida and the Intertwining of Political Calculation and Ultra-Politics. Theory and Event 9 (3):15.
Jack Reynolds, James Chase, James Williams & Edwin Mares (eds.) (2010). Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum.
James Chase (2010). Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
Claire Colebrook (2009). Derrida, Deleuze and Haptic Aesthetics. Derrida Today 2 (1):22-43.
Jack Reynolds & James Chase (2010). Analytic Versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy, Co-Authored with James Chase, Stocksfield, UK: Acumen Publishing 2010. ISBN 978-1-84465-245-7. [REVIEW] Acumen.
Babette E. Babich (2003). On the Analytic-Continental Divide in Philosophy : Nietzsche's Lying Truth, Heidegger's Speaking Language, and Philosophy. In C. G. Prado (ed.), A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Humanity Books
Kir Kuiken (2005). Deleuze/Derrida: Towards an Almost Imperceptible Difference. Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):290-310.
Jack Reynolds (2007). Wounds and Scars: Deleuze on the Time and Ethics of the Event. Deleuze Studies 1 (2):144-166.
C. J. (2003). Iterability and the Order-Word Plateau: 'A Politics of the Performative' in Derrida and Deleuze/Guattari. Critical Horizons 4 (2):227-264.
P. Patton (2003). Concept and Politics in Derrida and Deleuze. Critical Horizons 4 (2):157-175.
Added to index2011-08-12
Total downloads51 ( #88,883 of 1,938,529 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #30,945 of 1,938,529 )
How can I increase my downloads?