Graduate studies at Western
Contretemps (3):133-47 (2002)
|Abstract||In Telling Flesh: the Substance 0f the C0rporeul, Vicki Kirby suggests, among other things, that it is not in the interests of feminism to propound what she describes as an ‘inessentialist’ position in regards to embodiment. While she objects to undifferentiating biological givens that might, for example, attempt to construe women as confined to a nurturing role, she also does not want to simplistically insist that embodiment has nothing to do with subjectivity. To pose the problem in terms more closely aligned with her own, Kirby is wary of the tendency to simply reverse binary oppositions, to swap nature for culture, reality for representation, and originary cause for interpretive effect. According to her, themes like ‘textuality’, and linguistic ideality have all but replaced the notion of ‘reality’. As arguably the pre-eminent ‘continental’ philosopher of our generation, the work of Derrida is invariably associated with this reversal of binary oppositions that seem to prohibit recourse to questions concerning embodiment. Several critics have even suggested that deconstruction is nothing but semiological reductionism in disguise. However, Kirby’s thesis, via an extended meditation upon Derrida’s claim that "there is nothing outside of the text," constitutes an important attempt to redeem him from such criticism. Rather than eschewing any and every reference to the body, she wants to insist that deconstruction cannot be contained within such a framework, and that it makes sense, within the logic of Of Grummutology (and she also pays cursory attention to Derrida’s ""Eating Well," or the Calculation of the Subject"), to conceive of embodiment in deconstructive terms. Examining the coherence of this claim will be the main focus of this paper, though in order to facilitate this task, this paper will also compare the notion of embodiment that Kirby espouses, to a curiously similar conception of the body that Merleau-Ponty theorizes in his unfinished text The Wsible und the Invisible..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jack Reynolds (2004). Possible and Impossible, Self and Other, and the Reversibility of Merleau-Ponty and Derrida. Philosophy Today 48 (1):35-49.
David Morris (1999). The Fold and the Body Schema in Merleau-Ponty and Dynamic Systems Theory. Chiasmi International 1:275-286.
Ann V. Murphy (2010). “All Things Considered:” Sensibility and Ethics in the Later Merleau-Ponty and Derrida. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):435-447.
Jack Reynolds (2002). Habituality and Undecidability: A Comparison of Merleau-Ponty and Derrida on the Decision. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (4):449 – 466.
Jack Reynolds (2002). Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, and the Alterity of the Other. Symposium 6 (1):63-78.
Jack Reynolds & Jon Roffe (2006). Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty: Immanence, Univocity and Phenomenology. Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology 37 (3):228-51.
Vicki Kirby (2010). Original Science: Nature Deconstructing Itself. Derrida Today 3 (2):201-220.
Seamus Carey (2000). Cultivating Ethos Through the Body. Human Studies 23 (1):23-42.
Kelly A. Burns (2008). Warren's Ecofeminist Ethics and Merleau-Ponty's Body-Subject: Intersections. Ethics and the Environment 13 (2):pp. 101-118.
Vicki Kirby (2011). Quantum Anthropologies: Life at Large. Duke University Press.
Glen Mazis (1997). Merleau-Ponty, Derrida, and Joyce's Ulysses: Is Derrida Really Bloom, Merleau-Ponty Dedalus, and Who Can Say 'Yes" to Molly? In M. C. Dillon (ed.), Ecart and Differance: Merleau-Ponty and Derrida on Seeing and Writing. Humanities.
Mauro Carbone (2004). The Thinking of the Sensible: Merleau-Ponty's a-Philosophy. Northwestern University Press.
Added to index2011-01-06
Total downloads23 ( #60,206 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?