Res Publica 5 (1) (1999)
|Abstract||In the legal judgement reason demands that it extend itself beyond the mere subjective limits of the self in order that it might fashion a judgement that speaks for the other. This is the universal necessity of the judgement. No claim of truth or the moral law can guarantee that others will agree with this judgement: thus disputation is the risk which reason takes in order to judge at all. The author examines this audacity of judgement by reference to Kant's autonomy of reason, which risks itself in the thought that thinks.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rico Hauswald (2010). Umfangslogik Und Analytisches Urteil Bei Kant. Kant-Studien 101 (3):283-308.
Harold I. Brown (1994). Reason, Judgement and Bayes's Law. Philosophy of Science 61 (3):351-369.
Ido Geiger (2009). Is Teleological Judgement (Still) Necessary? Kant's Arguments in the Analytic and in the Dialectic of Teleological Judgement. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (3):533 – 566.
A. John Maule (2001). Studying Judgement: Some Comments and Suggestions for Future Research. Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):91 – 102.
Nigel Harvey (2001). Studying Judgement: General Issues. Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):103 – 118.
Alexander Miller (2009). Primary Qualities, Secondary Qualities and the Truth About Intention. Synthese 171 (3).
David Andrew Bell (1979). Frege's Theory of Judgement. Oxford University Press.
Fiona Hughes (2006). On Aesthetic Judgement and Our Relation to Nature: Kant's Concept of Purposiveness. Inquiry 49 (6):547 – 572.
Miles Rind (2003). Kant's Beautiful Roses: A Response to Cohen's ‘Second Problem’. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):65-74.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #83,239 of 551,103 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,103 )
How can I increase my downloads?