David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):47 - 64 (2008)
This paper examines voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting as a form of moral discourse. It explores how alternative stakeholder perspectives lead to differing perceptions of the process and content of responsible reporting. We contrast traditional stakeholder theory, which views stakeholders as external parties having a social contract with corporations, with an emerging perspective, which views interaction among corporations and constituents as relational in nature. This moves the stakeholder from an external entity to one that is integral to corporate activity. We explore how these alternative stakeholder perspectives give rise to different normative demands for stakeholder engagement, managerial processes, and communication. We discuss models of CSR reporting and accountability: EMAS, the ISO 14000 series, SA8000, AA1000, the Global Reporting Initiative, and the Copenhagen Charter. We explore how these models relate to the stakeholder philosophies and find that they are largely consistent with the traditional atomistic view but fall far short of the demands for moral engagement prescribed by a relational stakeholder perspective. Adopting a relational view requires stakeholder engagement not only in prescribing reporting requirements, but also in discourse relating to core aspects of the corporation such as mission, values, and management systems. Habermas’ theory of communicative action provides guidelines for engaging stakeholders in this moral discourse.
|Keywords||stakeholder engagement stakeholder reporting relational stakeholder perspective corporate social responsibility Theory of Communicative Action discourse ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jürgen Habermas (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, 'Reason and the Rationalization of Society'. Polity..
David M. Rasmussen, Jurgen Habermas, Christian Lenhardt & Shierry Weber Nicholsen (1993). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.
Russell Sparkes & Christopher J. Cowton (2004). The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):45-57.
Rogene A. Buchholz & Sandra B. Rosenthal (2005). Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):137 - 148.
Karl-Otto Apel (1980). Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. Marquette University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel Arenas, Josep M. Lozano & Laura Albareda (2009). The Role of Ngos in Csr: Mutual Perceptions Among Stakeholders. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):175 - 197.
Martin Mueller, Virginia Gomes dos Santos & Stefan Seuring (2009). The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards Towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):509-523.
James Weber (2010). Assessing the “Tone at the Top”: The Moral Reasoning of Ceos in the Automobile Industry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 92 (2):167 - 182.
Miguel Rivera-Santos & Carlos Rufín (2010). Odd Couples: Understanding the Governance of Firm—NGO Alliances. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (1):55 - 70.
Paul Neiman (2013). A Social Contract for International Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (1):75-90.
Similar books and articles
Elsa González (2002). Defining a Post-Conventional Corporate Moral Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1-2):101 - 108.
Andrew C. Wicks (2007). Corporate and Stakeholder Responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):375-398.
Loke Min Foo (2007). Third Way CR and Third World CR: In What Way Should Responsible Corporations Serve the World? International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:35-53.
Loke Min Foo (2007). Third Way CR and Third World CR. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:35-53.
David Hess (2008). The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4):447-482.
David Hess (2007). Social Reporting and New Governance Regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3):453-476.
Ataur R. Belal & Robin W. Roberts (2010). Stakeholders' Perceptions of Corporate Social Reporting in Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (2):311 - 324.
Simon Knox, Stan Maklan & Paul French (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting Across Leading FTSE Companies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 61 (1):7 - 28.
Kate Grosser & Jeremy Moon (2005). Gender Mainstreaming and Corporate Social Responsibility: Reporting Workplace Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (4):327 - 340.
Michelle Greenwood (2007). Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):315 - 327.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #80,222 of 1,911,817 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #61,898 of 1,911,817 )
How can I increase my downloads?