International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):275 – 287 (1999)
|Abstract||“Historicism” has become a ubiquitous and equivocal term. A classification is given here of five separate uses of the term currently in vogue, each provided with a unique qualifying adjective to help keep them distinct. I then offer a few objections to some of the more radical conclusions which have been drawn by proponents of a specific version of historicism, one associated with “postmodernism “. The positions of Rorty and Putnam are contrasted as examples of strong and weak degrees of historicism, respectively.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Hanns Reill (1975). The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism. University of California Press.
Peter Munz (1997). The Quixotic Element in the Open Society. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):39-55.
Gustav Bergmann (1944). Holism, Historicism, and Emergence. Philosophy of Science 11 (March):209-21.
Peter Woodford (2012). Specters of the Nineteenth Century: Charles Taylor and the Problem of Historicism. Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):171-192.
Arnaldo Momigliano (1974). Historicism Revisited. North-Holland Pub. Co..
Edward Grippe, Richard Rorty (1931- ). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Paul G. Kuntz (1969). The Dialectic of Historicism and Anti-Historicism. The Monist 53 (4):656-670.
Charles R. Bambach (1995). Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis of Historicism. Cornell University Press.
Herman Paul (2010). Religion and the Crisis of Historicism: Protestant and Catholic Perspectives. Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):172-194.
Jack A. Bonsor (1990). An Orthodox Historicism? Philosophy and Theology 4 (4):335-350.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #40,899 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?