David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 43 (1):42 - 62 (1998)
At "Categories" 12b5-16 Aristotle appears to regard the referents of declarative sentences, such as "Socrates is sitting," as what later writers were to call "complexe significabilia," i.e., items such as that Socrates is sitting. Simplicius' discussion of this passage in his commentary on the "Categories" clearly shows the influence of Stoic philosophy of language; but, if we follow the text printed by Kalbfleisch, Simplicius' commentary is seen to be a muddle of Stoic and Aristotelian elements, neither properly understood. It is possible, however, by making a crucial emendation to the text, to preserve the Aristotelian integrity of Simplicius' theory of meaning. On that line Simplicius would be adopting the view that a declarative sentence refers to a thought in the first instance and a "complexe significabile" in the second instance. This view is plausibly the upshot of combining the "Categories" text with the first chapter of "De Interpretatione."
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jan Opsomer (2001). Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter (De Mal. Subs. 30-7 ). Phronesis 46 (2):154-188.
Jan Opsomer (2001). Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter ("De Mal. Subs." 30-7). Phronesis 46 (2):154 - 188.
A. C. Lloyd (1991). Simplicius on the Categories Ilsetraut Hadot (Ed., Tr.): Simplicius, Commentaire Sur les Catégories: Traduction Commentée. Fasc. I: Introduction, Première Partie; Fasc. III: Préambule aux Catégories. (Philosophia Antiqua, 50 and 51.) 2 Fascicles. Fasc. I: Pp. X + 239; Fasc. Ill: Pp. Ix + 179. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1990. Paper, Fl. 80 and Fl. 70. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):324-325.
Marc-Antoine Gavray (2011). Archytas Lu Par Simplicius. Un Art de la Conciliation. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):85-158.
L. S. B. MacCoull (1998). The Anaximander Saying in its Sixth-Century (C. E.) Context. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):85-96.
H. J. Blumenthal (1982). The Psychology of (?) Simplicius' Commentary on the de Anima. In H. J. Blumenthal & A. C. Lloyd (eds.), Soul and the Structure of Being in Late Neoplatonism: Syrianus, Proclus, and Simplicius: Papers and Discussions of a Colloquium Held at Liverpool, 15-16 April 1982. Liverpool University Press
Zeev Perelmuter (2010). Nous and Two Kinds of Episteme in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics. Phronesis 55 (3):228-254.
Stephen Menn (2010). Simplicius on the Theaetetus (In Physica 17,38-18,23 Diels). Phronesis 55 (3):255-270.
Rachel Barney (2009). Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority. Antiquorum Philosophia 3:101-120.
Gaskin (1998). Simplicius on the Meaning of Sentences: A Commentary on In Cat. 396,30-397,28. Phronesis 43 (1):42-62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #279,812 of 1,792,085 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,915 of 1,792,085 )
How can I increase my downloads?