Book review: Peter Aczel. Non-well-founded sets [Book Review]

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (2):308-312 (1989)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093635087
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jacob Lurie (1999). Anti-Admissible Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):407-435.
Ulrich Nortmann (1995). Vier Philosophen Über Semantische Paradoxien. History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (2):217-244.
Peter Aczel (1980). Frege Structures and the Notions of Proposition, Truth and Set. In J. Barwise, H. J. Keisler & K. Kunen (eds.), Journal of Symbolic Logic. North-Holland 244-246.
Luca Incurvati (2014). The Graph Conception of Set. Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (1):181-208.
John P. Burgess (1988). Sets and Point-Sets: Five Grades of Set-Theoretic Involvement in Geometry. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:456 - 463.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

4 ( #405,485 of 1,725,449 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,436 of 1,725,449 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.