Graduate studies at Western
Religious Studies 46 (3):281-302 (2010)
|Abstract||Discussions of the evidential argument from evil generally pay little attention to how different models of divine providence constrain the theist's options for response. After describing four models of providence and general theistic strategies for engaging the evidential argument, I articulate and defend a definition of 'gratuitous evil' that renders the theological premise of the argument uncontroversial for theists. This forces theists to focus their fire on the evidential premise, enabling us to compare models of providence with respect to how plausibly they can resist it. I then assess the four models, concluding that theists are better off vis-à-vis the evidential argument if they reject meticulous providence|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Keith Chrzan (1988). When is a Gratuitous Evil Really Gratuitous? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 24 (1/2):87 - 91.
William Hasker (2010). Defining 'Gratuitous Evil': A Response to Alan R. Rhoda. Religious Studies 46 (3):303-309.
Bryan Frances (2013). Gratuitous Suffering and the Problem of Evil: A Comprehensive Introduction. Routledge.
Keith Yandell (1989). Gratuitous Evil and Divine Existence. Religious Studies 25 (1):15 - 30.
Genevieve Lloyd (2008). Providence Lost. Harvard University Press.
Robert Bass (2011). Many Inscrutable Evils. Ars Disputandi 11:118-132.
David O'Connor (1995). Hasker on Gratuitous Natural Evil. Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):380-392.
Peter Geach (1977). Providence and Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-07-29
Total downloads34 ( #40,625 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?