Sextus, Montaigne, Hume

Modern Schoolman 87 (1):7-34 (2009)
Despite their divergences, I argue that Sextus, Montaigne, and Hume are committed to several substantive points of commonality and that these commonalities justify us in speaking of them as belonging to a unitary Pyrrhonist tradition. In this tradition, Pyrrhonizing doubt serves to chart the boundary of that-which-resists-doubt, thereby simultaneously charting the shape of that complex of nature and custom which constitutes the bedrock of human life—the life that remains after doubt has done its worst
Keywords Sextus Empiricus  Michel de Montaigne  David Hume  Pyrrhonism  skepticism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/schoolman200987111
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,570
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Diego E. Machuca (2008). Sextus Empiricus: His Outlook, Works, and Legacy. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 55 (1/2):28-63.
Dan Moller (2010). The Pyrrhonian Skeptic's Telos. Ancient Philosophy 24 (2):425 - 441.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #142,776 of 1,938,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #122,845 of 1,938,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.