David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 12 (2):119 (2000)
This paper criticizes the conception of applied ethics as the top-down application of a theory to practical issues. It is argued that a theory such as utilitarianism cannot override our intuitive moral perceptions. We cannot be radically mistaken about the kinds of considerations which count as practical reasons, and it is the task of theoretical ethics to articulate the basic kinds of considerations which we appeal to in practical discussions. Dworkin's model of doing ethics is used to illustrate the appropriate role for theory in a broader sense. In conclusion, some sceptical questions are raised about how far theoretical ethics can contribute to public policy, especially if this requires a consensus
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Allmark (2006). An Argument for the Use of Aristotelian Method in Bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (1):69-79.
David Archard (2012). Moral Compromise. Philosophy 87 (03):403-420.
Similar books and articles
Hans-Johann Glock (2011). Doing Good by Splitting Hairs? Analytic Philosophy and Applied Ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):225-240.
Fritz Allhoff (2011). What Are Applied Ethics? Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):1-19.
Daniel A. Moros, Rosamond Rhodes, Bernard Baumrin & James J. Strain (1987). Thinking Critically in Medicine and its Ethics: Relating Applied Science and Applied Ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy 4 (2):229-243.
Joan Tronto (2011). Who is Authorized to Do Applied Ethics? Inherently Political Dimensions of Applied Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):407-417.
R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.) (2003). A Companion to Applied Ethics. Blackwell Pub..
Sami Pihlström (1999). Applied Philosophy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):121-133.
Joseph P. DeMarco, Richard M. Fox & Michael D. Bayles (eds.) (1986). New Directions in Ethics: The Challenge of Applied Ethics. Routledge & K. Paul.
J. N. Kanyua Mugambi & David W. Lutz (eds.) (2012). Applied Ethics in Religion and Culture: Contextual and Global Challenges. Action Publishers.
Onora O'neill (2009). Applied Ethics: Naturalism, Normativity and Public Policy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):219-230.
Richard M. Fox (1989). “Toward an Adequate Theory of Applied Ethics”. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 4 (4):45-51.
Richard M. Fox (2000). Moral Reasoning: A Philosophic Approach to Applied Ethics. Harcourt College Publishers.
Bonnie Steinbock (2013). How has Philosophical Applied Ethics Progressed in the Past Fifty Years? Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):58-62.
Joseph P. DeMarco & Richard M. Fox (1989). “Toward an Adequate Theory of Applied Ethics”. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 4 (4):45-51.
Torbjörn Tännsjö (2011). Applied Ethics. A Defence. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):397-406.
Guy Axtell & Philip Olson (2012). Recent Work in Applied Virtue Ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):183-204.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads34 ( #124,680 of 1,934,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,672 of 1,934,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?