Arguments in a Sartorial Mode, or the Asymmetries of History and Philosophy of Science

Abstract
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several important asymmetries govern their relationship. These asymmetries, concerning levels of analysis, evidence, theories, writing, and training show that to be a decent philosopher of science is more difficult than being a decent historian. But to be a good historian-well, the degree of difficulty is reversed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Daniel M. Hausman (1982). Causal and Explanatory Asymmetry. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:43 - 54.
    C. Hitchock (2000). Review. Causal Asymmetries. DM Hausman. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):175-179.
    Henry Byerly (1990). Causes and Laws: The Asymmetry Puzzle. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:545 - 555.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-05-29

    Total downloads

    3 ( #224,045 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    0

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.