Arguments in a Sartorial Mode, or the Asymmetries of History and Philosophy of Science

History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several important asymmetries govern their relationship. These asymmetries, concerning levels of analysis, evidence, theories, writing, and training show that to be a decent philosopher of science is more difficult than being a decent historian. But to be a good historian-well, the degree of difficulty is reversed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,280
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Daniel M. Hausman (1982). Causal and Explanatory Asymmetry. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:43 - 54.
C. Hitchock (2000). Review. Causal Asymmetries. DM Hausman. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):175-179.
Henry Byerly (1990). Causes and Laws: The Asymmetry Puzzle. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:545 - 555.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

8 ( #470,842 of 1,932,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #456,114 of 1,932,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.