D. H. Lawrence on cézanne: A study in the psychology of critical intuition
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 28 (4):441-453 (1970)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlison Gopnik & Eric Schwitzgebel (1998). Whose Concepts Are They, Anyway? The Role of Philosophical Intuition in Empirical Psychology. In M. R. DePaul & William Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Lawrence Weiskrantz & Alan Cowey (1970). Filling in the Scotoma: A Study of Residual Vision After Striate Cortex Lesions in Monkeys. Progress in Physiological Psychology 3.
George Bealer (1998). Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy. In Rethinking Intuition.
Laurence BonJour (2001). Michael DePaul and William Ramsey (Eds) Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):151-158.
Michael R. DePaul & William Ramsey (eds.) (1998). Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Rowman & Littlefield.
John R. Wettersten (1974). Methods in Psychology; a Critical Case Study of Pavlov. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4 (1):17-34.
George Bealer (1998). Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy. In Michael DePaul & William Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Rowman & Littlefield.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads26 ( #47,662 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
