Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Topics 38 (1):181-203 (2010)
|Abstract||There are intriguing hints in the works of Stanley Cavell and Stephen Mulhall of a possible connection between ethics and Wittgenstein’s remarks on private language, which are concerned with expressions of Empfindungen: feelings or sensations. The point of this paper is to make the case explicitly for seeing such a connection. What the point of that is I will address at the end of the paper. If Mulhall and Cavell both know their Wittgenstein and choose their words carefully, which I will take as given, then the (to me) irresistible inference is that they see a connection between Wittgenstein’s thoughts on ethics and his thoughts on private language. Yet this connection has not, as far as I know, been made explicit. Can it be? Should it be? These are my questions. Even if no one ever intended a connection between the “Lecture on Ethics” and the remarks on private language, those remarks do at least touch on issues raised in the lecture, and it is worth thinking about what the author of those remarks would say about the lecture. So in this paper I summarize the “Lecture on Ethics” (in part I), look at the private language remarks themselves (in part II), and then apply some ideas from these remarks to the “Lecture on Ethics” in part III. My conclusion will be that Wittgenstein’s later remarks are largely consistent with his earlier ones, the main difference being that some of what he first called nonsense he later called secondary meaning. One result of this change is that attempts to express the feelings that Wittgenstein regards as fundamental to ethics, aesthetics, and religion are first treated as doomed to result in nonsense but later as risky. Like cries of pain, they might or might not find a sympathetic audience|
|Keywords||Wittgenstein private langauge ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen Mulhall (2007). Wittgenstein's Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations, Sections 243-315. Oxford University Press.
John A. Humphrey (1996). Kripke's Wittgenstein and the Impossibility of Private Language: The Same Old Story? Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (January):197-207.
Marie McGinn (2010). Wittgenstein's Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations, §§243-315 (Review). [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 34 (1):pp. 265-269.
M. Shabbir Ahsen, Private Language Questions in Contemporary Analytical Philosophy Analytical Study of Wittgenstein's Treatments of Private Language and its Implications.
Francois-Igor Pris, Phenomenal Concepts Are Consistent with Wittgenstein’s Private Language Argument (2012).
Matthew Pianalto (2011). Speaking for Oneself: Wittgenstein on Ethics. Inquiry 54 (3):252 - 276.
David Bain (2004). Private Languages and Private Theorists. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):427 - 434.
G. E. M. Anscombe (1985). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (1):103-109.
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
Duncan Richter (2002). Whose Ethics? Which Wittgenstein? Philosophical Papers 31 (3):323-342.
Benjamin F. Armstrong (1984). Wittgenstein on Private Languages: It Takes Two to Talk. Philosophical Investigations 7 (January):46-62.
Dale Jacquette (1999). Quantum Indeterminacy and Wittgenstein's Private Language Argument. Philosophical Explorations 2 (2):79 – 95.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads5 ( #170,097 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?