E pluribus unum: A defense of Davidson's individuation of action
Philosophical Studies 29 (3):191 - 198 (1976)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGiuseppina D'Oro (2007). Two Dogmas of Contemporary Philosophy of Action. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):10-24.
Robert D. Murray (1995). Is Davidson's Theory of Action Consistent? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):317 - 334.
Bruce Vermazen & Merrill B. Hintikka (eds.) (1985). Essays on Davidson. Oxford University Press.
Mark Rowlands (1990). Anomalism, Supervenience, and Davidson on Content-Individuation. Philosophia 20 (3):295-310.
Andrei A. Buckareff (2011). Action-Individuation and Doxastic Agency. Theoria 77 (4):312-332.
Nathaniel Goldberg (2004). E Pluribus Unum: Arguments Against Conceptual Schemes and Empirical Content. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):411-438.
Thomas Stalnaker & Geoffrey Schoenbaum (2008). E Pluribus Unum? A New Take on Addiction by Redish Et Al. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):459-459.
Charles L. Griswold Jr (2000). E Pluribus Unum? On the Platonic 'Corpus'. Ancient Philosophy 20 (1):361-397.
Chauncey Maher (2011). Action Individuation: A Normative Functionalist Approach. Philosophical Explorations 14 (1):99-116.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #113,941 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
