David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):663-687 (2001)
There is extensive discussion of the ethical, social, economic and political issues associated with the use of technologies based on DNA techniques. Many of these debates are premised on the assumption that DNA, and the genetic information that may be derived from it, have unique features which raise new social and ethical issues. In this paper it is argued that several of the features associated with DNA which are sometimes regarded as unique are shared with other biological materials. Others owe more to the cultural image of DNA and some of the metaphors used to discuss it in biology and in wider debates than to the biological properties of DNA. The paper discusses the concepts of genetic material and genetic information and the social construction of DNA in relation to forensic DNA databases, paternity testing and genetic testing for disease. The paper concludes by suggesting that there are seven areas where issues related to DNA and genetic information are at least relatively distinct.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Péter Kakuk (2008). Gene Concepts and Genethics: Beyond Exceptionalism. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):357-375.
Jane Wilson (2005). To Know or Not to Know? Genetic Ignorance, Autonomy and Paternalism. Bioethics 19 (5-6):492-504.
Ilhan Ilkilic (2009). Coming to Grips with Genetic Exceptionalism: Roots and Reach of an Explanatory Model. [REVIEW] Medicine Studies 1 (2):131-142.
Ruth Wilkinson (2010). Unjustified Discrimination: Is the Moratorium on the Use of Genetic Test Results by Insurers a Contradiction in Terms? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 18 (3):279-293.
Similar books and articles
Ruth Hannah Wilkinson (2010). Genetic Information: Important but Not “Exceptional”. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):457-472.
Angela Davey, Ainsley Newson & Peter O.’Leary (2006). Communication of Genetic Information Within Families: The Case for Familial Comity. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):161-166.
Holly K. Fernandez (2005). Genetic Privacy, Abandonment, and DNA Dragnets: Is Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence Adequate? Hastings Center Report 35 (1):21-23.
Ulrich E. Stegmann (2009). Dna, Inference, and Information. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):1-17.
Matteo Mameli (2005). The Inheritance of Features. Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):365-399.
Richard vSternberg (2008). DNA Codes and Information: Formal Structures and Relational Causes. Acta Biotheoretica 56 (3).
James Maclaurin (1998). Reinventing Molecular Weismannism: Information in Evolution. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 13 (1):37-59.
Rogeer Hoedemaekers & Wim Dekkers (2001). Is There a Unique Moral Status of Human DNA That Prevents Patenting? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (4):359-386.
Søren Holm (2001). The Privacy of Tutankhamen – Utilising the Genetic Information in Stored Tissue Samples. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (5):437-449.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #103,892 of 1,096,606 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #158,594 of 1,096,606 )
How can I increase my downloads?