Is it True What Haack Says About Tarski?
Philosophy 62 (240):237- (1987)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPanu Raatikainen (2003). More on Putnam and Tarski. Synthese 135 (1):37 - 47.
Susan Haack (2007). Of Chopin and Sycamores : Response to Ryszard Wójcicki. In Cornelis De Waal (ed.), Susan Haack: A Lady of Distinctions: The Philosopher Responds to Critics. Prometheus Books.
Timothy Bays (2001). On Tarski on Models. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1701-1726.
Greg Frost-Arnold (2004). Was Tarski's Theory of Truth Motivated by Physicalism? History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (4):265-280.
Greg Ray (2005). On the Matter of Essential Richness. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (4):433 - 457.
Richard C. Jennings (1987). Tarski - a Dilemma. Inquiry 30 (1 & 2):155 – 172.
Richard L. Kirkham (1993). Tarski's Physicalism. Erkenntnis 38 (3):289-302.
Susan Haack (1976). Is It True What They Say About Tarski? Philosophy 51 (197):323-.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads2 ( #232,211 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
