David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):398-399 (2010)
The Andalusian philosopher Ibn Rushd had two names in the medieval Latin West: 'the Commentator', and 'Averroes'. The first of these underscores his importance as an interpreter of Aristotle . The second was modified at least once by the adjective 'accursed' . 'That accursed Averroes' refers to the person who held that there exists only one human intellect. Averroes defends this view—typically called the unicity doctrine—in his Long Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima.Richard C. Taylor's translation of the Long Commentary is based on Crawford's 1953 edition of the medieval Latin text . Brief portions of this commentary, which relate directly to the controversial and influential unicity doctrine, have previously been translated into English. Taylor's complete translation makes available in English for the first time the whole account of the soul and its powers, of which the unicity doctrine is a part. The translation will benefit graduate or advanced undergraduate students of the history of philosophy, as well as non-specialist scholars who want to understand what all the fuss was about. Taylor also
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matthias Lu (1953). Aristotle's De Anima With the Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas. New Scholasticism 27 (4):486-489.
W. D. Ross (1908). Hicks's Aristotle, De Anima Aristotle, De Anima, with Translation, Introduction and Notes. By R. D. Hicks, M.A., Fellow and Late Lecturer of Trinity College, Cambridge. Cambridge: University Press, 1907. Pp. Lxxxiii + 626. 18s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 22 (07):218-221.
Aristotle (1993). De Anima: Books Ii and Iii. Clarendon Press.
Catherine Osborne (1983). Aristotle, De Anima 3. 2: How Do We Perceive That We See and Hear? Classical Quarterly 33 (02):401-411.
Rega Wood (2001). Richard Rufus's De Anima Commentary: The Earliest Known, Surviving, Western De Anima Commentary. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 10 (1):119-156.
Averroës (2002). Averroës' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima: A Critical Edition of the Arabic Text. Brigham Young University Press.
J. D. G. Evans (1995). Aristotle's De Anima Michael Durrant (Ed.): Aristotle's De Anima in Focus. Pp. Xiii+225. London, New York: Routledge, 1993. £35 (Paper, £11.99). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (01):60-61.
Ronald M. Polansky (2007). Aristotle's de Anima. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-06-30
Total downloads36 ( #121,209 of 1,938,743 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,338 of 1,938,743 )
How can I increase my downloads?