Religious Studies 37 (2):161-175 (2001)
|Abstract||In this paper I contrast some widespread ideas about what Wittgenstein said about religious belief with statements Wittgenstein made about his purposes and method in doing philosophy, in order to argue that he did not hold the views commonly attributed to him. These allegedly Wittgensteinian doctrines in fact essentialize religion in a very un-Wittgensteinian way. A truly Wittgensteinian philosophy of religion can only be a personal process, and there can be no part in it for generalized hypotheses or conclusions about religion in general. Why is it that in this case I seem to be missing the entire point?1.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jerome Ikechukwu Okonkwo, Worldhood Competence and Performance: The Site for Wittgenstein"s Religious Language.
Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.) (2009). Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy: Essays for P. M. S. Hacker. OUP Oxford.
Duncan Richter (2001). Wittgensteinian Foundationalism. Erkenntnis 55 (3):349–358.
Shabbir Ahsen (2010). Ludwig Wittgenstein: Ethics and Religion (Review). Philosophy East and West 60 (3):422-424.
Mikel Burley (2010). Is There a Tension in Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Religion? Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1000-1010.
Bob Plant (2004). The Wretchedness of Belief: Wittgenstein on Guilt, Religion, and Recompense. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (3):449 - 476.
Sami Pihlström (2007). Religion and Pseudo-Religion: An Elusive Boundary. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (1):3 - 32.
Stig Børsen Hansen (2010). The Later Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Religion. Philosophy Compass 5 (11):1013–22.
D. Z. Phillips (2003). Wittgenstein, Wittgensteinianism, and Magic: A Philosophical Tragedy? Religious Studies 39 (2):185-201.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #40,877 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?