David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):259-268 (2008)
Steven Tudor defends the mitigation of criminal sentences in cases in which offenders are genuinely remorseful for their crimes. More than this, he takes the principle that such remorse-based sentence reductions are appropriate to be a âwell-settled legal principleââso well settled, in fact, that âit is among those deep-seated commitments which can serve to test general theories as much as they are tested by themâ. However, his account of why remorse should reduce punishment is strongly philosophical in character. He sets to one side the many practical difficulties in implementing such reductions in the real world of criminal justice institutions so that he can focus on the question of whether a plausible account of sentencing can show that remorse should mitigate punishment. I contend that Tudorâs defense of such reductions is unpersuasive in certain respects. Yet even if it can be made more persuasive, I argue that the conditions that would have to be satisfied for remorse-based sentence reductions to be justifiably implemented are so many and various that they would likely exceed our abilities to responsibly grant them in real world legal contexts. I therefore claim that Tudor has failed to provide a defense of the âremorse principleâ that serves to explain or justify existing legal practices
|Keywords||Remorse Sentence reductions Sentencing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard L. Lippke (2009). Retributive Parsimony. Res Publica 15 (4):377-395.
Richard L. Lippke (2008). To Waive or Not to Waive: The Right to Trial and Plea Bargaining. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):181-199.
Ben Vilhauer (2004). Hard Determinism, Remorse, and Virtue Ethics. Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):547-564.
Stephen De Wijze (2005). Tragic-Remorse — the Anguish of Dirty Hands. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):453 - 471.
Stephen De Wijze (2005). Tragic-Remorse–the Anguish of Dirty Hands. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):453-471.
Steven Keith Tudor (2008). Why Should Remorse Be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing? Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):241-257.
Steven Tudor (2008). Remorse, Reform and the Real World: Reply to Lippke. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):269-272.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads2 ( #337,488 of 1,096,839 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #273,068 of 1,096,839 )
How can I increase my downloads?