Graduate studies at Western
Minds and Machines 21 (4):517-532 (2011)
|Abstract||This paper draws upon contemporary feminist philosophy in order to consider the changing meaning of privacy and its relationship to identity, both online and offline. For example, privacy is now viewed by European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as a right, which when breached can harm us by undermining our ability to maintain social relations. I briefly outline the meaning of privacy in common law and under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in order to show the relevance of contemporary feminist thought, in particular the image of selfhood that stresses its relationality. I argue that the meaning of privacy is in the process of altering as a result of a number of contingent factors including both changes in technology, particularly computer mediated communication (CMC), and changes in the status of women. This latter point can be illustrated by the feminist critique of the traditional reluctance of the liberal state to interfere with violence and injustice within the “privacy” of the home. In asking the question: “how is the meaning of “privacy” changing?” I consider not only contemporary legal case law but also Thomas Nagel’s influential philosophical analysis of privacy. Nagel’s position is useful because of the detail with which he outlines what privacy used to mean, whilst bemoaning its passing. I agree with his view that its meaning is changing but am critical of his perspective. In particular, I challenge his claim regarding the traditional “neutrality of language” and consider it in the context of online identity|
|Keywords||CMC Feminism Identity Law Privacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Madison Powers (1996). A Cognitive Access Definition of Privacy. Law and Philosophy 15 (4):369 - 386.
Lü Yao-Huai (2005). Privacy and Data Privacy Issues in Contemporary China. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (1):7-15.
Steven Davis (2009). Is There a Right to Privacy? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475.
Lars Øystein Ursin (2008). Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Dawn Jutla (2010). Layering Privacy on Operating Systems, Social Networks, and Other Platforms by Design. Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):319-341.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2010). The Liberal Value of Privacy. Law and Philosophy 29 (5):505-534.
Luciano Floridi (2005). The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185-200.
Krisana Kitiyadisai (2005). Privacy Rights and Protection: Foreign Values in Modern Thai Context. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (1):17-26.
W. A. Parent (1983). A New Definition of Privacy for the Law. Law and Philosophy 2 (3):305 - 338.
Janice Richardson (2011). Untimely Voices. Angelaki 16 (2):143 - 157.
Gordon Hull, Heather Richter Lipford & Celine Latulipe (2011). Contextual Gaps: Privacy Issues on Facebook. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 13 (4):289-302.
Edward Craig (1997). Meaning and Privacy. In Bob Hale & C. Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell.
Ferdinand David Schoeman (ed.) (1984). Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-09-07
Total downloads19 ( #71,375 of 740,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?