The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1986)
Heinrich Rickert (1863-1936) was One of the leading neo-Kantian philosophers in Germany and a crucial figure in the discussions of the foundations of the social sciences in the first quarter of the twentieth century. His views were extremely influential, most significantly on Max Weber. The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science is Rickert's most important work, and it is here translated into English for the first time. It presents his systematic theory of knowledge and philosophy of science, and deals particularly with historical knowledge and the problem of demarcating the natural from the human sciences. The theory Rickert develops is carefully argued and of great intrinsic interest. It departs from both positivism and neo-Hegelian idealism and is worked out by contrast to the views of others, particularly Dilthey and the early phenomenologists.
|Keywords||History Philosophy Science Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$19.98 used (61% off) $34.99 new (31% off) $49.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||D16.8.R53213 1986|
|ISBN(s)||0521310156 0521251397 9780521310154|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Anton Froeyman, Laszlo Kosolosky & Jeroen Van Bouwel (2016). Introduction: Social Epistemology Meets the Philosophy of the Humanities. Foundations of Science 21 (1):1-13.
Adam Konopka (2009). The Role of Umwelt in Husserl's Aufbau and Abbau of the Natur/Geist Distinction. Human Studies 32 (3):313 - 333.
David Kaiser (1998). A Mannheim for All Seasons: Bloor, Merton, and the Roots of the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Science in Context 11 (1).
Gary Backhaus (2003). Husserlian Affinities in Simmel's Philosophy of History: The 1918 Essay. [REVIEW] Human Studies 26 (2):223-258.
Damian Veal (2005). Editorial Introduction. Angelaki 10 (1):1 – 31.
Similar books and articles
Frederick Beiser (2009). Normativity in Neo-Kantianism: Its Rise and Fall. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):9 – 27.
Guy Oakes (1988). Rickert's Value Theory and the Foundations of Weber's Methodology. Sociological Theory 6 (1):38-51.
Immanuel Kant (2004). Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.
James W. McAllister (1997). Laws of Nature, Natural History, and the Description of the World. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (3):245 – 258.
Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn (1997). Webers Idealtypus AlS Methode Zur Bestimmung Des Begriffsinhaltes Theoretischer Begriffe in den Kulturwissenschaften. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):275 - 296.
John Drysdale (1996). How Are Social-Scientific Concepts Formed? A Reconstruction of Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation. Sociological Theory 14 (1):71-88.
H. P. Rickman (1989). Book Reviews : The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural Science: A Logical Introduction to the Historical Sciences. Abridged Edition. By Heinrich Rickert. Edited and Translated by Guy Oakes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. Pp. XXXII + 240. $15.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (3):401-404.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #136,804 of 1,907,220 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #343,301 of 1,907,220 )
How can I increase my downloads?