David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Dennis Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime Ii. Elsevier 133--52 (2008)
Background independence is generally considered to be ‘the mark of distinction’ of general relativity. However, there is still confusion over exactly what background independence is and how, if at all, it serves to distinguish general relativity from other theories. There is also some confusion over the philosophical implications of background independence, stemming in part from the deﬁnitional problems. In this paper I attempt to make some headway on both issues. In each case I argue that a proper account of the observables of such theories goes a long way in clarifying matters. Further, I argue, against common claims to the contrary, that the fact that these observables are relational has no bearing on the debate between substantivalists and relationalists, though I do think it recommends a structuralist ontology, as I shall endeavour to explain.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kristian Camilleri & Sophie Ritson (2015). The Role of Heuristic Appraisal in Conflicting Assessments of String Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 51:44-56.
Similar books and articles
Robert G. Hudson (1994). Background Independence and the Causation of Observations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (4):595-612.
Oliver Pooley (2010). Substantive General Covariance: Another Decade of Dispute. In Mauricio Suárez, Mauro Dorato & Miklós Rédei (eds.), EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association. Springer 197--209.
C. S. Jenkins (2005). Realism and Independence. American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):199 - 209.
Lee Smolin (2006). The Case for Background Independence. In Dean Rickles, Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity. Oxford University Press 196--239.
Rasmus Hansen (2011). Equality of Resources and the Problem of Recognition. Res Publica 17 (2):157-174.
Alf Onshuus (2006). Properties and Consequences of Thorn-Independence. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (1):1 - 21.
Domenico Giulini (2007). Some Remarks on the Notions of General Covariance and Background Independence. Lecture Notes in Physics 721:105--20.
Patrick Toner (2011). Independence Accounts of Substance and Substantial Parts. Philosophical Studies 155 (1):37 - 43.
Gordon Belot (2011). Background-Independence. General Relativity and Gravitation 43:2865-2884.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads58 ( #77,529 of 1,934,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #91,971 of 1,934,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?