David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Erkenntnis 55 (3):349–358 (2001)
The idea that there is such a thing as Wittgensteinian foundationalism is a provocative one for two reasons. For one thing, Wittgenstein is widely regarded as an anti-foundationalist. For another, the very word `foundationalism' sounds like the name of a theory, and Wittgenstein famously opposed the advancing of theories and theses in philosophy. Nonetheless, in his book Moore and Wittgenstein on Certainty, Avrum Stroll has argued that Wittgenstein does indeed develop a foundationalist view in his final work, On Certainty. On this basis, Stroll goes on to argue against a number of contemporary views, including forms of relativism and scientism. In what follows I will examine what Stroll calls Wittgenstein's foundationalism (in Section 1) and argue that Stroll's reading of Wittgenstein, though original and interesting, is misguided in important ways and so cannot be used against the views he opposes (in Section 2). Finally, in Section 3, I offer a brief summary of the reading of Wittgenstein that I recommend.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Ethics Logic Ontology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gale Macleod (forthcoming). Authority and the Teacher. By William H. Kitchen. Pp 202. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 2014. £16.99 . ISBN 978-1-4725-2428-7. [REVIEW] British Journal of Educational Studies:1-4.
Similar books and articles
Russell B. Goodman (2002). Wittgenstein and William James. Cambridge University Press.
Mark Colby (1999). The Epistemological Foundations of Practical Reason. Inquiry 42 (1):25 – 47.
Michael Bergmann (2004). What's NOT Wrong with Foundationalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):161–165.
Avrum Stroll (1989). Wittgenstein's Nose. In Brian McGuinness & Rudolf Haller (eds.), Grazer Philosophische Studien. Rodopi 395-413.
Duncan Richter (2001). Missing the Entire Point: Wittgenstein and Religion. Religious Studies 37 (2):161-175.
Yong Huang (1995). Foundation of Religious Beliefs After Foundationalism: Wittgenstein Between Nielsen and Phillips. Religious Studies 31 (2):251 - 267.
Stig Børsen Hansen (2010). The Later Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Religion. Philosophy Compass 5 (11):1013–22.
Jordan Curnutt (1998). Huang on Wittgenstein on Religious Epistemology. Religious Studies 34 (1):81-89.
Avrum Stroll (1994). Moore and Wittgenstein on Certainty. Oxford University Press.
Robert Greenleaf Brice (2009). Recognizing Targets: Wittgenstein's Exploration of a New Kind of Foundationalism in on Certainty. Philosophical Investigations 32 (1):1-22.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #72,894 of 1,779,059 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #86,917 of 1,779,059 )
How can I increase my downloads?