Justice and Procedure: How does “accountability for reasonableness” result in fair limit-setting decisions?
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (1):12-16 (2009)
|Abstract||orman Daniels’ theory of justice and health faces a serious practical problem: his theory can ground the special moral importance of health and allows distinguishing just from unjust health inequalities, but it provides little practical guidance for allocating resources when they are especially scarce. Daniels’ solution to this problem is a fair process that he specifies as "accountability for reasonableness". Daniels claims that accountability for reasonableness makes limit-setting decisions in healthcare not only legitimate, but also fair. This paper assesses the latter claim. Does accountability for reasonableness result in fair limit-setting decisions? It is argued that the answer to this question is not a clear yes. Daniels is remarkably unclear about the criterion of fairness that accountability for reasonableness satisfies. The paper discusses different options for resolving this lack of clarity and examines how they apply to Daniels’ accountability for reasonableness framework. It is concluded, first, that accountability for reasonableness is not a paradigm case of any of the classic notions of procedural justice; second, that what might be called "constrained pure procedural justice" best reflects how accountability for reasonableness results in fair limit-setting decisions; and third, that the procedural conditions of accountability for reasonableness must be further specified and amended to better achieve a fair process, and hence fair limit-setting decisions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sigurd Lauridsen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2009). Legitimate Allocation of Public Healthcare: Beyond Accountability for Reasonableness. Public Health Ethics 2 (1):59-69.
Lindsay M. Sabik & Reidar K. Lie (2008). Principles Versus Procedures in Making Health Care Coverage Decisions: Addressing Inevitable Conflicts. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (2):73-85.
Mollie Painter-Morland (2006). Redefining Accountability as Relational Responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):89 - 98.
Alex Friedman (2008). Beyond Accountability for Reasonableness. Bioethics 22 (2):101–112.
Bryn Williams-Jones & Michael M. Burgess (2004). Social Contract Theory and Just Decision Making: Lessons From Genetic Testing for the BRCA Mutations. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):115-142.
Samia A. Hurst, Nathalie Mezger & Alex Mauron (2009). Allocating Resources in Humanitarian Medicine. Public Health Ethics 2 (1):89-99.
David A. Gruenewald (2005). Accountability and Collaboration: Institutional Barriers and Strategic Pathways for Place-Based Education. Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (3):261 – 283.
Thomas A. Spragens (2008). Democratic Reasonableness. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):193-214.
Norman Daniels (2001). Justice, Health, and Healthcare. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):2 – 16.
Added to index2009-09-03
Total downloads8 ( #131,816 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?