Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):469-472 (1999)
|Abstract||Jehovah's Witnesses are students of the Bible. They refuse transfusions out of obedience to the scriptural directive to abstain and keep from blood. Dr Muramoto disagrees with the Witnesses' religious beliefs in this regard. Despite this basic disagreement over the meaning of Biblical texts, Muramoto flouts the religious basis for the Witnesses' position. His proposed policy change about accepting transfusions in private not only conflicts with the Witnesses' fundamental beliefs but it promotes hypocrisy. In addition, Muramoto's arguments about pressure to conform and coerced disclosure of private information misrepresent the beliefs and practices of Jehovah's Witnesses and ignore the element of individual conscience. In short, Muramoto resorts to distortion and uncorroborated assertions in his effort to portray a matter of religious faith as a matter of medical ethical debate|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
G. L. Bock (2012). Jehovah's Witnesses and Autonomy: Honouring the Refusal of Blood Transfusions. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (11):652-656.
J. R. Spencer (2002). A Point of Contention: The Scriptural Basis for the Jehovah's Witnesses' Refusal of Blood Transfusions. Christian Bioethics 8 (1):63-90.
O. Muramoto (1998). Bioethics of the Refusal of Blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 1. Should Bioethical Deliberation Consider Dissidents' Views? Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (4):223-230.
O. Muramoto (1998). Bioethics of the Refusal of Blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 2. A Novel Approach Based on Rational Non-Interventional Paternalism. Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):295-301.
D. Robert MacDougall (2010). Rawls and the Refusal of Medical Treatment to Children. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):130-153.
R. Gillon (2000). Refusal of Potentially Life-Saving Blood Transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: Should Doctors Explain That Not All JWs Think It's Religiously Required? Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5):299-301.
O. Muramoto (2000). Medical Confidentiality and the Protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' Autonomous Refusal of Blood. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5):381-386.
O. Muramoto (1999). Bioethics of the Refusal of Blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 3. A Proposal for a Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell Policy. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):463-468.
L. Elder (2000). Why Some Jehovah's Witnesses Accept Blood and Conscientiously Reject Official Watchtower Society Blood Policy. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5):375-380.
R. Singelenberg (2001). Jehovah's Witnesses-the Blood Transfusion Taboo. Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):138-138.
Joelyn Knopf Levy (1999). Jehovah's Witnesses, Pregnancy, and Blood Transfusions: A Paradigm for the Autonomy Rights of All Pregnant Women. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (2):171-189.
D. M. Shaw & J. Busch (2012). Rawls and Religious Paternalism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (4):373-386.
Akira Akabayashi, Brian T. Slingsby, Noriko Nagao, Ichiro Kai & Hajime Sato (2007). An Eight-Year Follow-Up National Study of Medical School and General Hospital Ethics Committees in Japan. BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-8.
Jorge Hernández-Arriaga, Carlos Aldana-Valenzuela & Kenneth V. Iserson (2001). Jehovah's Witnesses and Medical Practice in Mexico: Religious Freedom, Parens Patriae, and the Right to Life. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):47-52.
James Calvin Davis (2005). William Ames's Calvinist Ambiguity Over Freedom of Conscience. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):333 - 355.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads3 ( #213,863 of 739,462 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,462 )
How can I increase my downloads?