Moral non-naturalism

Abstract

There may be as much philosophical controversy about how to distinguish naturalism from non-naturalism as there is about which view is correct. In spite of this widespread disagreement about the content of naturalism and non-naturalism there is considerable agreement about the status of certain historically influential philosophical accounts as non-naturalist. In particular, there is widespread agreement that G.E. Moore's account of goodness in.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Naturalism, Theism, Obligation and Supervenience.Alvin Plantinga - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):247-272.
Philosophical Naturalism at the Turn of the Century.Robert Audi - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:27-45.
Three sorts of naturalism.Hans Fink - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):202–221.
Why naturalism?David Copp - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):179-200.
Two kinds of naturalism in ethics.Neil Sinclair - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (4):417 - 439.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
159 (#110,437)

6 months
11 (#127,761)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Ridge
University of Edinburgh

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references