David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):204–224 (2007)
There are passages in Nietzsche that can be read as contributions to the free will/determinism debate. When read in that way, they reveal a fairly amateurish metaphysician with little of real substance or novelty to contribute; and if these readings were apt or perspicuous, it seems to me, they would show that Nietzsche's thoughts about freedom were barely worth pausing over. They would simply confirm the impression—amply bolstered from other quarters—that Nietzsche was not at his best when addressing the staple questions of philosophy. But these readings sell Nietzsche short. He had next to no systematic interest in metaphysics, and his concern with the question of freedom was not motivated by metaphysical considerations. Rather—and as with all of Nietzsche's concerns—his motivations were ethical. He was interested, not in the relation of the human will to the causal order of nature, but in the relation between freedom and the good life, between the will and exemplary human living. Read from this perspective, Nietzsche's remarks about freedom actually add up to something. And what they add up to is one aspect of his attempt to understand life after the model of art. Beauty, for Kant, was an image of the moral.1 For Nietzsche, by contrast—and the contrast can be hard to spell out—art was an image of the ethical.2 My hope here is to begin to explain why Nietzsche might have thought that the issue of freedom was relevant to that. In sections 1–3, I attempt to show why Nietzsche is not best read as a participant in the standard free will/determinism debate; in sections 4–6, I try to spell out the ethical conception of freedom that he develops instead
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Aristotle (2012). Nicomachean Ethics. Courier Dover Publications.
Bernard Arthur Owen Williams (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
John Henry McDowell (1998). Mind, Value, and Reality. Harvard University Press.
Joseph Raz (1999). Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford University Press.
Jean-Paul Sartre (1956/1994). Being and Nothingness. Distributed by Random House.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Simon May (ed.) (2011). Nietzsche's on the Genealogy of Morality: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Donald Rutherford (2011). Freedom as a Philosophical Ideal: Nietzsche and His Antecedents. Inquiry 54 (5):512 - 540.
Daniel T. O'Hara (2009). The Art of Reading as a Way of Life: On Nietzsche's Truth. Northwestern University Press.
Carl B. Sachs (2008). Nietzsche's Daybreak. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):81-100.
Tom Meyer (2007). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Nietzsche on Art by Ridley, Aaron. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (4):426–428.
Mark P. Jenkins (2010). Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy (Review). Journal of Nietzsche Studies 40:85-90.
Robert Guay (2002). Nietzsche on Freedom. European Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):302–327.
Aaron Ridley (2009). Nietzsche's Intentions: What the Sovereign Individual Promises. In Ken Gemes & Simon May (eds.), Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy. Oxford University Press 181--196.
Tom Stern (2009). Nietzsche, Freedom and Writing Lives. Arion 17 (1):85-110.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #108,149 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?