David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):511-553 (2010)
Heidegger and East-Asian thought have traditionally been strongly correlated. However, although still largely unrecognized, significant differences between the political and metaphysical stance of Heidegger and his perceived counterparts in East-Asia most certainly exist. One of the most dramatic discontinuities between East-Asian thought and Heidegger is revealed through an investigation of Kitarō Nishida’s own vigorous criticism of Heidegger. Ironically, more than one study of Heidegger and East-Asian thought has submitted that Nishida is that representative of East-Asian thought whose philosophy most closely resembles Heideggerian thought. In words that then and now resound discordantly within the enshrined, established view of Heidegger’s relationship to East-Asian thought, Nishida stated uninhibitedly his own view of Heidegger in the noteworthy statement: “Heidegger is not worth your time… He…does not recognize that which is indispensible and decisive, namely, God.” This present study lays out for the first time in English, the significant differences between the metaphysical and political stances of Nishida and Heidegger, Nishida’s own critique of Heidegger, and Heidegger’s own rather dismal assessment of non-Western philosophy, all of which demonstrate a remarkable, hitherto unrecognized discontinuity between Heidegger and East-Asian thought.
|Keywords||Heidegger Nishida Kyoto School Nothingness God Karl Barth Ethnocentrism Nazism East-Asian philosophy Comparative philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Martin Heidegger (1998). Pathmarks. Cambridge University Press.
Karl Barth (2004). Church Dogmatics. Edinburgh: T and T Clark.
Martin Heidegger (1971). On the Way to Language. Harper & Row.
Charles R. Bambach (2003). Heidegger's Roots: Nietzsche, National Socialism and the Greeks. Cornell University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
David W. Johnson (2014). Perception, Expression, and the Continuity of Being: Some Intersections Between Nishida and Gadamer. Asian Philosophy 24 (1):48-66.
Ritsuko Okano (2015). Nishida and Plotinus. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 9 (1):1-26.
Similar books and articles
Eric LeMay (1994). Heidegger for Beginners. For Beginners Llc.
Elmar Weinmayr, tr Krummel, John W. M. & Douglas Ltr Berger (2005). Thinking in Transition: Nishida Kitaro and Martin Heidegger. Philosophy East and West 55 (2):232-256.
Mark Basil Tanzer (1998). Heidegger on Realism and Idealism. Journal of Philosophical Research 23:95-111.
Rein Raud (2004). 'Place' and 'Being-Time': Spatiotemporal Concepts in the Thought of Nishida Kitaro and Dogen Kigen. Philosophy East and West 54 (1):29-51.
Lin Ma & J. Brakevanl (2006). Heidegger's Comportment Toward East-West Dialogue. Philosophy East and West 56 (4):519-566.
John W. M. Krummel (2010). The Originary Wherein: Heidegger and Nishida on the Sacred and the Religious. Research in Phenomenology 40 (3):378-407.
Curtis A. Rigsby (2009). Nishida on God, Barth and Christianity. Asian Philosophy 19 (2):119 – 157.
Added to index2010-02-01
Total downloads109 ( #38,700 of 1,938,452 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #288,361 of 1,938,452 )
How can I increase my downloads?