David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 15 (1):123-142 (2003)
An early and persistent criticism of Rahner was his use of transcendental philosophy and his emphasis on human subjectivity, with an attendant loss of concrete historicity and human embodiment. By finding connections between Rahner’s concept of the transcendental and philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein’s treatment of language and its uses, the article highlights Rahner’s own often-overlooked treatment of human embodiment and concrete historicity. The argument here focuses on the priority of being over appearance, and the necessary connection between intentions and actions, important themes in both men’s thought
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary V. Maher (1992). Rahner on the Human Experience of God. Philosophy and Theology 7 (2):127-164.
Mark Joseph T. Calano (2008). Rahnerian Freedom. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 20:51-68.
Nicholas Adams (2000). The Present Made Future. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):191-211.
Terrance W. Klein (2003). The Forge of Language. Philosophy and Theology 15 (1):143-163.
Peter C. Phan (1995). Is Karl Rahner's Doctrine of Sin Orthodox? Philosophy and Theology 9 (1/2):223-236.
William M. Thompson (1992). Word & Spirit, Hermeneutics & Transcendental Method. Philosophy and Theology 7 (2):185-212.
Richard Lennan (2000). Rahner's Theology of the Priesthood and the Development of Doctrine. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):155-185.
Theresa Sanders (1994). Rest for the Restless? Philosophy and Theology 8 (4):347-362.
Terrence W. Tilley (2005). What Kind of Faith is Possible in Our Contexts? Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):259-277.
Richard Lennan (2005). Faith in Context: Rahner on the Possibility of Belief. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):233-258.
Howard Ebert (1993). Immutability of God. Philosophy and Theology 8 (1):41-61.
Miguel Díaz (2004). A Critical Reading, Appreciation, and Assessment of Responses to on Being Human. Philosophy and Theology 16 (1):151-162.
Carmichael Peters (1998). On Teaching Karl Rahner to Undergraduates. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):207-217.
Jessica M. Murdoch (2010). Overcoming the Foundationalist/Nonfoundationalist Divide. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):373-387.
Mark F. Fischer (2010). Rahner's “New Christology” in Foundations of Christian Faith. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):389-404.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads8 ( #175,863 of 1,099,671 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #32,138 of 1,099,671 )
How can I increase my downloads?