Reassessing the Foster-care system: Examining the impact of heterosexism on lesbian and gay applicants
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 22 (1):132-148 (2007)
: In this essay, Riggs demonstrates how heterosexism shapes foster-care assessment practices in Australia. Through an examination of lesbian and gay foster-care applicants' assessment reports and with a focus on the heteronormative assumptions contained within them, Riggs demonstrates that foster-care public policy and research on lesbian and gay parenting both promote the idea that lesbian and gay parents are always already "just like" heterosexual parents. To counter this idea of "sameness," Riggs proposes an approach to both assessing and researching lesbian and gay parents that privileges the specific experiences of lesbians and gay men and resists the heterosexualization of lesbian and gay families by focusing on some potentially radical differences shaping lesbian and gay lives
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Lisa Cosgrove (2003). Feminism, Postmodernism, and Psychological Research. Hypatia 18 (3):85-112.
Donna Haraway (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3):575-599.
Ruthann Robson (1992). Mother: The Legal Domestication of Lesbian Existence. Hypatia 7 (4):172 - 185.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lori Watson (2003). Cheshire Calhoun, Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement:Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement. Ethics 113 (2):396-400.
Sonja J. Ellis * (2004). Rights‐Based Reasoning in Discussions About Lesbian and Gay Issues: Implications for Moral Educators. Journal of Moral Education 33 (1):71-86.
Mark Blasius & Shane Phelan (eds.) (1997). We Are Everywhere: A Historical Sourcebook of Gay and Lesbian Politics. Routledge.
Cheshire Calhoun (2002). Feminism, the Family, and the Politics of the Closet: Lesbian and Gay Displacement. Oup Oxford.
Chris Cuomo (2007). Dignity and the Right to Be Lesbian or Gay. Philosophical Studies 132 (1):75 - 85.
Peg O'Connor (2006). Swimming Against the Mainstream Gay and Lesbian Agenda. Radical Philosophy Today 3:83-89.
Gary Hicks & Hillary Warren (1998). Whose Benefit? Gay and Lesbian Journalists Discuss Outing, the Individual, and the Community. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (1):14 – 25.
Sonja J. Ellis (2002). Moral Reasoning and Homosexuality: The Acceptability of Arguments About Lesbian and Gay Issues. Journal of Moral Education 31 (4):455-467.
Claudia Card (1996). Against Marriage and Motherhood. Hypatia 11 (3):1 - 23.
Alan Sears (2005). Queer Anti-Capitalism: What's Left of Lesbian and Gay Liberation? Science and Society 69 (1):92 - 112.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #230,346 of 1,410,432 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,872 of 1,410,432 )
How can I increase my downloads?