Synthese 169 (1):201 - 216 (2009)
|Abstract||This paper defends the theory that knowledge is credit-worthy true belief against a family of objections, two instances of which were leveled against it in a recent paper by Jennifer Lackey. Lackey argues that both innate knowledge (if there is any) and testimonial knowledge are too easily come by for it to be plausible that the knower deserves credit for it. If this is correct, then knowledge would appear not to be a matter of credit for true belief. I will attempt to neutralize these objections by drawing a distinction between credit as praiseworthiness and credit as attributability|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William J. Rapaport (2011). A Triage Theory of Grading: The Good, the Bad, and the Middling. Teaching Philosophy 34 (4):347–372.
Marek Hudon (2009). Should Access to Credit Be a Right? Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):17 - 28.
John Greco (2003). ``Knowledge as Credit for True Belief". In Michael DePaul & Linda Zagzebski (eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives From Ethics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wayne Riggs (2007). Why Epistemologists Are so Down on Their Luck. Synthese 158 (3):329 - 344.
Krist Vaesen (2011). Knowledge Without Credit, Exhibit 4: Extended Cognition. Synthese 181 (515):529.
Jason Baehr (2012). Credit Theories and the Value of Knowledge. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):1-22.
Benjamin McMyler (2012). Responsibility for Testimonial Belief. Erkenntnis 76 (3):337-352.
Jennifer Lackey (2009). Knowledge and Credit. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):27 - 42.
Jennifer Lackey (2007). Why We Don't Deserve Credit for Everything We Know. Synthese 158 (3):345--361.
Riggs Wayne (2009). Two Problems of Easy Credit. Synthese 169:201 - 216.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #27,938 of 549,224 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,224 )
How can I increase my downloads?