David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):103-117 (2011)
Martin Heidegger’s radical critique of technology has fundamentally stigmatized modern technology and paved the way for a comprehensive critique of contemporary Western society. However, the following reassessment of Heidegger’s most elaborate and influential interpretation of technology, The Question Concerning Technology, sheds a very different light on his critique. In fact, Heidegger’s phenomenological line of thinking concerning technology also implies a radical critique of ancient technology and the fundamental being-in-the-world of humans. This revision of Heidegger’s arguments claims that The Question Concerning Technology indicates a previous unseen ambiguity with respect to the origin of the rule of das Gestell. The following inquiry departs from Heidegger’s critique of modern technology and connects it to a reassessment of ancient technology and Aristotle’s justification of slavery. The last part of the paper unfolds Heidegger’s underlying arguments in favor of continuity within the history of technology. According to these interpretations, humans have always strived to develop modern technology and to become truly modern in the Heideggerian sense. The danger stemming from the rule of das Gestell is thus not only transient and solely directed toward contemporary Western society, but also I will argue that humans can only be humans as the ones challenged by the rule of das Gestell
|Keywords||Phenomenology Genealogy Modernity Western history Anthropology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tracy Colony (2009). Concerning Technology. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):23-34.
John Loscerbo (1981). Being and Technology: A Study in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger. Distributed by Kluwer Boston.
Don Ihde (2010). Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. Fordham University Press.
Troy R. E. Paddock (2010). Bridges. Environment, Space, Place 2 (2):9-27.
Trish Glazebrook (2000). Heidegger's Philosophy of Science. Fordham University Press.
Fredrik Svenaeus (2013). The Relevance of Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology for Biomedical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):1-15.
Iain Thomson (2000). From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg. Inquiry 43 (2):203 – 215.
Dana S. Belu & Andrew Feenberg (2010). Heidegger's Aporetic Ontology of Technology. Inquiry 53 (1):1-19.
W. P. S. Dias (2003). Heidegger's Relevance for Engineering: Questioning Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):389-396.
Iain D. Thomson (2005). Heidegger on Ontotheology: Technology and the Politics of Education. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph K. Cosgrove (2007). Beauty and the Destitution of Technology. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):109-125.
Martin Heidegger (2010). Pt. III: Existential and Phenomenological Considerations. The Question Concerning Technology. In Craig Hanks (ed.), Technology and Values: Essential Readings. Wiley-Blackwell.
Added to index2011-02-11
Total downloads60 ( #24,094 of 1,096,616 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #24,329 of 1,096,616 )
How can I increase my downloads?