David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Argumentation 11 (4):463-477 (1997)
The article discusses burden of proof rules in social criticism. By social criticism I mean an argumentative situation in which an opponent publicly argues against certain social practices; the examples I consider are discrimination on the basis of species and discrimination on the basis of one's nationality. I argue that burden of proof rules assumed by those who defend discrimination are somewhat dubious. In social criticism, there are no shared values which would uncontroversially determine what is the reasonable presumption and who has the burden of proof, nor are there formal rules which would end the debate and determine the winner at a specific point
|Keywords||Presumptions burden of proof rules conservatism discrimination equality open questions|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken & Douglas N. Walton (2007). The Carneades Model of Argument and Burden of Proof. Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15):875-896.
Anthony Ellis (2010). War Crimes, Punishment and the Burden of Proof. Res Publica 16 (2):181-196.
Tim Dare & Justine Kingsbury (2008). Putting the Burden of Proof in Its Place: When Are Differential Allocations Legitimate? Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):503-518.
Thorsten Sander (2003). Beweislastverteilung Und Intuitionen in Philosophischen Diskursen. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34 (1):69-97.
Imran Aijaz, Jonathan McKeown-Green & Aness Webster (2013). Burdens of Proof and the Case for Unevenness. Argumentation 27 (3):259-282.
Ole T. Hjortland (2009). The Structure of Logical Consequence : Proof-Theoretic Conceptions. Dissertation, University of St Andrews
Brian E. Butler (2001). Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach: Political Criticism and the Burden of Proof. International Journal of Politics and Ethics 1 (1):71-86.
Juha Raikka (2005). Global Justice and the Logic of the Burden of Proof. Metaphilosophy 36 (1-2):228-239.
Nissim Francez & Roy Dyckhoff (2012). A Note on Harmony. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):613-628.
R. Nichols (2013). Indigeneity and the Settler Contract Today. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (2):165-186.
Peter Murphy (ed.) (2003). Evidence, Proof, and Facts: A Book of Sources. New York ;Oxford University Press.
Gerhard Zecha (1992). Value-Neutrality and Criticism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 23 (1):153-164.
Peter van Inwagen (1980). Compatibilism and the Burden of Proof. Analysis 40 (March):98-100.
Crispin Wright (1995). Intuitionists Are Not (Turing) Machines. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (1):86-102.
David Godden & Douglas Walton (2007). A Theory of Presumption for Everyday Argumentation. Pragmatics and Cognition 15 (2):313-346.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads13 ( #133,399 of 1,413,361 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #67,207 of 1,413,361 )
How can I increase my downloads?