David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4) (1996)
In the discussion of such social questions as how should alcoholics be treated by society? and what kind of people are responsible in the face of the law?, is disease a value-free or value-laden notion, a natural or a normative one? It seems, for example, that by the utterance alcoholism should be classified as a disease we mean something like the following: the condition called alcoholism is similar in morally relevant respects to conditions that we uncontroversially label diseases, and therefore we have a moral obligation to consider alcoholism a disease. So there are grounds to think that, in the discussion of social questions, our concept of disease is strongly value-laden. However, it does not follow that the medical concept of disease is likewise value-laden. In this paper I distinguish between the medical and social concepts of disease, arguing that the naturalist-normativist debate is concerned with the former, but not the latter. Therefore, we need not settle the naturalist-normativist debate in order to conclude that the social concept of disease is value-laden.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Helena Siipi (2008). Dimensions of Naturalness. Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 71-103.
Andrew Miles & Michael Loughlin (2009). Philosophy, Freedom and the Public Good: A Review and Analysis of 'Public Health Ethics' Holland, S. (2007). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (5):838-858.
Similar books and articles
P. Thagard (1996). The Concept of Disease: Structure and Change. Philosophical Explorations 29:445-478.
Randolph M. Nesse (2001). On the Difficulty of Defining Disease: A Darwinian Perspective. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):37-46.
Walter Glannon (1998). Responsibility, Alcoholism, and Liver Transplantation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (1):31 – 49.
Germund Hesslow (1993). Do We Need a Concept of Disease? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1).
J. Angelo Corlett (1990). Fingarette on the Disease Concept of Alcoholism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (3).
Bjørn Hofmann (2001). Complexity of the Concept of Disease as Shown Through Rival Theoretical Frameworks. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (3):211-236.
Paula Boddington (2009). Heart Disease and Social Inequality: Ethical Issues in the Aetiology, Prevention and Treatment of Heart Disease. Bioethics 23 (2):123-130.
William E. Stempsey (2000). A Pathological View of Disease. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4):321-330.
Ron Berghmans, Johan de Jong, Aad Tibben & Guido de Wert (2009). On the Biomedicalization of Alcoholism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):311-321.
Thomas Schramme (2007). The Significance of the Concept of Disease for Justice in Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):121-135.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #65,277 of 1,410,275 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #75,847 of 1,410,275 )
How can I increase my downloads?