David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2):200-226 (2010)
I show that the standard libertarian conception of justice is vulnerable to a kind of basic collective self-defeat not characteristic of its rivals. All deontological liberals, including the libertarian, ought to be committed to two very general claims regarding the nature of justice. The RSC (Reasonable Stability Criterion) is the requirement that in the just society, human beings will typically exhibit genuine literacy with the relevant conception. The MEC (Moral Education Condition) consists in the thought that a necessary condition for any such literacy is a proper moral education. It is consistent with full respect for standard libertarian justice that a society living under its auspices will fail to satisfy the RSC, by failing to provide moral education to those who need it. This issues in the collective self-defeat of the conception, for by respecting all and only the constraints constitutive of libertarian justice, the group will have undermined the achievement of a characteristic aim
|Keywords||JUSTICE SELF-DEFEAT MORAL EDUCATION LIBERTARIAN REASONABLE STABILITY|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
W. Matthews Grant (2010). Can a Libertarian Hold That Our Free Acts Are Caused by God? Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):22-44.
J. P. Moreland (1997). Naturalism and Libertarian Agency. Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):353-383.
Mark T. Nelson (2009). A Problem for Conservatism. Analysis 69 (4):620-630.
R. Edward Freeman & Robert A. Phillips (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (3):331-350.
Pablo Gilabert (2006). Basic Positive Duties of Justice and Narveson's Libertarian Challenge. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):193-216.
Lawrence Alexander (1984). Reiman's Libertarian Interpretation of Rawls' Difference Principle. Philosophy Research Archives 10:13-18.
Wulf Gaertner (1985). Justice-Constrained Libertarian Claims and Pareto Efficient Collective Decisions. Erkenntnis 23 (1):1 - 17.
Added to index2010-08-16
Total downloads40 ( #98,674 of 1,790,294 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #429,817 of 1,790,294 )
How can I increase my downloads?