Philosophy 83 (1):77-88 (2008)
|Abstract||Peter Geach’s distinction between logically predicative and logically attributive adjectives has gained a certain currency in philosophy. For all that, no satisfactory explanation of what an attributive adjective is has yet been provided. We argue that Geach’s discussion suggests two different ways of understanding the notion. According to one, an adjective is attributive just in case predications of it in combination with a noun fail to behave in inferences like a logical conjunction of two separate predications. According to the other, an adjective is attributive just in case it cannot be applied in a truth-value-yielding fashion unless combined with a noun. The latter way of understanding the notion has been largely neglected by Geach’s critics, but we argue that taking account of it shows the misguided nature of some of their objections, and also yields a more satisfactory explanation of attributivity than does the other.|
|Keywords||Geach logic grammar goodness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James R. Beebe (2003). Attributive Uses of Prosentences. Ratio 16 (1):1–15.
Charles R. Pigden (2012). Identifying Goodness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):93 - 109.
Richard L. Mendelsohn (2010). Referential/Attributive: A Scope Interpretation. Philosophical Studies 147 (2):167 - 191.
Jan M. G. Aarts (1979). Metaphor and Non-Metaphor: The Semantics of Adjective Noun Combinations. Niemeyer.
Hélène Mazaleyrat & Audrey Rudel, Conceptual Modeling and Sense Construction. The Example of the French Adjective Curieux.
G. Pomerantz (1973). Man Without an Adjective. Ethics 83 (2):126-145.
Kent Bach (1981). Referential/Attributive. Synthese 49 (2):219 - 244.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #34,681 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #10,259 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?