David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 168 (3):405 - 422 (2009)
Starting from common-sense notions of ‘furniture of the world’ a process ontology is developed in which prospective is an integral part. Technology as configurations that work (precariously) embodies expectations which structure further development. Examples (a cloned puppy, hotel keys, DC airplanes, stem cells, and overpasses on Long Island) are used to develop the notion of material narratives that are “written”, not just by engineers and designers/producers, but also by users: “reading” implies some further “writing”. In contrast to prevailing notions of technological control (through manipulation of building blocks), the “writing” of nanotechnology is modulation of the invisible and impredictable - an extreme example of unruly technology and repair work after the fact, where in practice control is a gesture not so different from magic. Because ontology cannot be other than prospective, it is political throughout. Thus, prospective technology highlights ontological politics.
|Keywords||Process ontology Prospective Embodied expectations Material narrative Invisible technology Control Modulation Politics|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
A. Appadurai (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory, Culture and Society 7 (2):295-310.
Henri Bergson (1944/2007). Creative Evolution. New York, the Modern Library.
Colin Hay (2006). Political Ontology. In Robert E. Goodin & Charles Tilly (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Alan Irwin (2003). Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Open University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Astrid Schwarz & Alfred Nordmann (2011). “Hier Bin Ich Mensch, Hier Darf Ich's Sein!”—Partaking in the Nanoworld. Nanoethics 5 (2):233-243.
Similar books and articles
Patrick Feng (2000). Rethinking Technology, Revitalizing Ethics: Overcoming Barriers to Ethical Design. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):207-220.
Stuart J. Quarmby, The Leadership of Principals and Science Heads in Schools with a Christian Philosophy: Expectations and Realities.
Joel Feinberg (1988). Responsibility for the Future. Philosophy Research Archives 14:93-113.
P. Graf & B. Uttl (2001). Prospective Memory: A New Focus for Research. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):437-450.
Wolfgang Liebert & Jan C. Schmidt (2010). Towards a Prospective Technology Assessment: Challenges and Requirements for Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience. [REVIEW] Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):99-116.
Mincho Hadjiski & Veselin Petrov (eds.) (2008). Ontologies: Philosophical and Technological Problems: Proceedings of Solon - Sofia Lectures of Ontology, October 2007. Prof. Marin Drinov Academic Publishing House.
Dana S. Belu & Andrew Feenberg (2010). Heidegger's Aporetic Ontology of Technology. Inquiry 53 (1):1-19.
D. S. Horner (2005). Anticipating Ethical Challenges: Is There a Coming Era of Nanotechnology? [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):127-138.
Clive Lawson (2008). An Ontology of Technology. Techné 12 (1):48-64.
Added to index2009-01-31
Total downloads24 ( #70,807 of 1,098,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #114,620 of 1,098,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?