David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):355-377 (2007)
Standard economic theory teaches that trade benefits all countries involved, at least in the long run. While there are other reasons for trade liberalization, this insight, going back to Ricardo's 1817 Principles of Political Economy , continues to underlie international economics. Trade also raises fairness questions. First, suppose A trades with B while parts of A's population are oppressed. Do the oppressed in A have a complaint in fairness against B? Should B cease to trade? Second, suppose because of oppression or lower social standards, A's products are cheaper than B's. Can industries in B legitimately insist that their government take measures to help them compete? The Pauper-Labor Argument makes that case, and many economists enjoy dismissing it in undergraduate classes. Third, suppose A subsidizes its industries. If this lowers world market prices, does B have a fairness complaint against A? Ought countries to consider how trade policies affect others? This article is the first of two, which together develop a view that is meant to serve as a reference point for moral assessments of international trade policies. I develop this view by way of offering affirmative answers to these three questions. Since this discussion is organized around these three questions, the two studies can be read independently of each other. Key Words: the state World Trade Organization development oppression exploitation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Helena de Bres (2011). The Many, Not the Few: Pluralism About Global Distributive Justice. Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (3):314-340.
Similar books and articles
Patricia J. Arnold & Terrie C. Reeves (2006). International Trade and Health Policy: Implications of the GATS for US Healthcare Reform. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 63 (4):313 - 332.
Joseph D. Beams, Robert M. Brown & Larry N. Killough (2003). An Experiment Testing the Determinants of Non-Compliance with Insider Trading Laws. Journal of Business Ethics 45 (4):309 - 323.
Francisco VanderHoff Boersma (2009). The Urgency and Necessity of a Different Type of Market: The Perspective of Producers Organized Within the Fair Trade Market. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 86 (1):51 - 61.
Christian Barry & Sanjay Reddy (2008). International Trade and Labor Standards:A Proposal for Linkage. Columbia University Press.
Peter Curwen (1994). The Ethics of International Trade. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (1):29-41.
Frederick Bird, Thomas Vance & Peter Woolstencroft (2009). Fairness in International Trade and Investment: North American Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 84 (3):405 - 425.
Nicole Hassoun (2009). Free Trade and the Environment. Environmental Ethics 31 (1):51-66.
Malgorzata Kurjanska & Mathias Risse (2008). Fairness in Trade II: Export Subsidies and the Fair Trade Movement. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):29-56.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #88,063 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #113,165 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?