David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):124-142 (2006)
Most people (and philosophers) distinguish between performing a morally wrong action and being blameworthy for having performed that action, and believe that an individual can be fully excused for having performed a wrong action. My purpose is to reject this claim. More precisely, I defend what I call the "Dependence Claim": A's doing X is wrong only if A is blameworthy for having done X. I consider three cases in which, according to the traditional view, a wrong action could be excused: duress, mental illness, and mistake. I try to show that the reasons for excusing in either case are not relevantly distinguishable from the reasons for claiming that the prima facie wrong action is not wrong all things considered
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
R. Jay Wallace (1996). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Harvard University Press.
J. L. Austin (1979). Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press.
Judith Jarvis Thomson (1990). The Realm of Rights. Harvard University Press.
Michael J. Zimmerman (1996). The Concept of Moral Obligation. Cambridge University Press.
Michael J. Zimmerman (1988). An Essay on Moral Responsibility. Rowman & Littlefield.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eduardo Rivera-lópez (2006). Can There Be Full Excuses for Morally Wrong Actions? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):124–142.
Ishtiyaque Haji (1997). An Epistemic Dimension of Blameworthiness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):523 - 544.
Ishtiyaque Haji (1997). An Epistemic Dimension of Blameworthiness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):523-544.
Lloyd Fields (2001). Coercion and Moral Blameworthiness. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):135-151.
Richard Swinburne (1976). Reply to Wallace's 'on Making Actions Morally Wrong'. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6:551 - 552.
Ishtiyaque Haji (2006). Frankfurt-Type Examples, Obligation, and Responsibility. Journal of Ethics 10 (3):255 - 281.
Elizabeth Harman (2009). Harming as Causing Harm. In M. A. Roberts & D. T. Wasserman (eds.), Harming Future Persons. Springer Verlag 137--154.
Jeremy Horder (2004). Excusing Crime. OUP Oxford.
Ishtiyaque Haji (1997). Frankfurt-Pairs and Varieties of Blameworthiness: Epistemic Morals. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 47 (3):351-377.
Eduardo Rivera-lópez (2009). Individual Procreative Responsibility and the Non-Identity Problem. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):336-363.
Andrew C. Khoury (2011). Blameworthiness and Wrongness. Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (2):135-146.
Julia Markovits (2010). Acting for the Right Reasons. Philosophical Review 119 (2):201-242.
David Detmer (2007). Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism. Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):39-48.
James Harold (2007). Imagining Evil (Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Sopranos). The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:7-14.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads13 ( #333,174 of 1,932,454 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,114 of 1,932,454 )
How can I increase my downloads?