Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):352-353 (2002)
|Abstract||We address the issue of the nature of representations during development regarding language acquisition. The controversy of syntax as a process or operation for representation formation and syntax as a representation in itself is discussed. Eliminating the cognitive unconscious does not warrant a simplified, more parsimonious approach to human cognition in general.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jacques Bouveresse (2009). Logical Syntax, Quasi-Syntax, and Philosophy. In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.
John Hawthorne (1989). On the Compatibility of Connectionist and Classical Models. Philosophical Psychology 2 (1):5-16.
Hengwei Li & Huaxin Huang (2007). Representation and Development of Cognition. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (4):583-600.
Paul J. M. Jorion (1999). Syntax, or, the Embryogenesis of Meaning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1027-1028.
Charles E. M. Dunlop (1990). Conceptual Dependency as the Language of Thought. Synthese 82 (2):275-96.
James W. Garson (1997). Syntax in a Dynamic Brain. Synthese 110 (3):343-55.
Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson (2006). Cognition Needs Syntax but Not Rules. In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #190,208 of 757,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 757,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?