David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Philosophy 25 (3):377-386 (2006)
We all agree on the justification of defending ourselves or others in some situations, but we do not often agree on why. Two main views compete: subjectivism and objectivism. The discussion has mainly been held in normative terms. But every theory must pass a previous test: logical consistency. It has recently been held that, at least in the case of defending others from aggression, objective theories lead, in some situations, to normative contradiction. My aim is to challenge the idea that only objective theories have this uncomfortable feature. In fact, any plausible theory justifying the defense of others, whether subjectively or objectively, can lead to situations of normative inconsistency. Therefore, the logical test is not the most fitting one for choosing between different theories of private defense.
|Keywords||Law Logic Philosophy of Law Law Theory/Law Philosophy Political Science Social Issues|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Cécile Fabre (2009). VIII-Permissible Rescue Killings. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt2):149-164.
Similar books and articles
Reuven Dar (1998). Null Hypothesis Tests and Theory Corroboration: Defending NHSTP Out of Context. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):196-197.
Ann E. Cudd (2005). How to Explain Oppression: Criteria of Adequacy for Normative Explanatory Theories. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1):20-49.
Charles T. Snowdon (1998). The Nurture of Nature: Social, Developmental, and Environmental Controls of Aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):384-385.
Anne Campbell, Steven Muncer & Josie Odber (1998). Primacy of Organising Effects of Testosterone. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):365-365.
Kris Borer (2010). Risking Aggression: Reply to Block. Libertarian Papers 2.
Berit Brogaard (2009). Color in the Theory of Colors? Or: Are Philosophers' Colors All White? In George Yancy (ed.), he Center Must Not Hold: White Women on The Whiteness of Philosophy.
Gerard Radnitzky (1987). The 'Economic' Approach to the Philosophy of Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (2):159-179.
Robin Fox (1999). Defending the Young: Female Aggression, Resources, Dominance, and the Emptiness of Patriarchy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):224-225.
Kirsti M. J. Lagerspetz (1999). Theories of Male and Female Aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):229-230.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #207,509 of 1,696,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #79,846 of 1,696,540 )
How can I increase my downloads?