David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):353-369 (2007)
This paper is an investigation of the role of comedy in philosophical thinking, particularly of how comedy reveals the erotic dimension of philosophical thinking.In the first half of the paper, I show that the relation between comedy and Eros is a powerful means to understand in what way philosophy is not technē. Philosophy in its erotic and comedic character is, rather, engaged with an appearing of things as ‘birthed’ or ‘living.’ In the second part of the paper, I focus on the role of comedy in the Laches. There I study the complex relationship between philosophy as erotic thinking and andreia or ‘manliness.’ I show that philosophy as erotic must distinguish itself from manliness and that the enactment of this differentiation is the core of the Laches. At the same time, manliness is not simply something that philosophy should not concern itself with. Philosophy must ask the question ‘what is manliness?’ as a way of enacting manliness and overcoming it, in an overcoming through which philosophy comes to its own erotic core
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Netta Zagagi (1986). New Comedy R. L. Hunter: The New Comedy of Greece and Rome. Pp. X + 183. Cambridge University Press, 1985. £22.50 (Paper, £7.95). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (02):252-254.
R. Woolf (2002). Plato and the Hero: Courage, Manliness and the Impersonal Good. Philosophical Review 111 (1):95-97.
D. Mervyn Jones (1958). Fragments of Attic Comedy J. M. Edmonds: The Fragments of Attic Comedy. Vol. I: Old Comedy. Pp. 1028. Leyden: Brill, 1957. Cloth, Fl. 98. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 8 (3-4):237-241.
Brian Ribeiro (2008). A Distance Theory of Humour. Think 6 (17/18):139-148.
D. Mervyn Jones (1960). Middle Comedy J. M. Edmonds: The Fragments of Attic Comedy. Vol. Ii: Middle Comedy. Pp. 683. Leiden: Brill, 1959. Cloth, Fl. 70. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 10 (03):202-204.
T. F. Morris (2009). Manliness in Plato's Laches. Dialogue 48 (3):619.
Stephen Halliwell (2003). ANDREIA IN PLATO A. Hobbs: Plato and the Hero: Courage, Manliness and the Impersonal Good . Pp. Xvii + 280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Cased, £37.50, ISBN: 0-521-41733-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (01):53-.
Simon Goldhill (2004). MASCULINITY R. M. Rosen, I. Sluiter (Edd.): Andreia. Studies in Manliness and Courage in Classical Antiquity . ( Mnemosyne Suppl. 238.) Pp. Vi + 359, Ills. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2003. Cased, €80/US$93. ISBN:90-04-11995-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (02):437-.
Angela Hobbs (2000). Plato and the Hero: Courage, Manliness, and the Impersonal Good. Cambridge University Press.
Omar Rivera (2007). The Comedy of Patricide (Or: A Passing Sense of Manliness). Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):353-369.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?