David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Market Forces 1 (4):23-33 (2006)
The relation between the regimes of the accumulation of men and the accumulation of capital is problematised in the works of Michel Foucault. The paper challenges the prevailing wisdom that the relation between these regimes is contingent. The fundamental question of the conditions of the possibility of relation between the two regimes is raised. It is argued that both regimes are primordially related. Focusing on the Foucauldian analysis of the regime of the accumulation of men and its constituent elements an effort is made to thematize the primordial relation between the two regimes. It is shown that freedom is the condition of the possibility of a primordial relation between the two regimes. It is explained why freedom plays such a fundamental role in making possible and sustaining a capitalist order. The dual role of freedom as a principle of diversity and a principle of management is stressed. It is argued that capitalism as an order is conditioned upon the production and reproduction of individuals and populations that are simultaneously useful and free. It is also the condition of such an order that docility is produced without hampering utility. Freedom makes possible the enhancement of utility without making it unmanageable.
|Keywords||Foucault capitalism freedom|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ali M. Rizvi (2012). Biopower, Governmentality, and Capitalism Through the Lenses of Freedom: A Conceptual Enquiry. Pakistan Business Review 14 (3):490-517.
Johanna Oksala (2005). Foucault on Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Guoping Zhao (2012). The Self and Human Freedom in Foucault and Zhuangzi. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39 (1):139-156.
Ian Burkitt (1993). Overcoming Metaphysics: Elias and Foucault on Power and Freedom. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):50-72.
Allison Weir (2009). Who Are We?: Modern Identities Between Taylor and Foucault. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):533-553.
Dianna Taylor (2003). Practicing Politics with Foucault and Kant: Toward a Critical Life. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (3):259-280.
Réal Fillion (2004). Freedom, Responsibility, and the ‘American Foucault’. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):115-126.
Kevin Neuhouser (1993). Foundations of Class Compromise: A Theoretical Basis for Understanding Diverse Patterns of Regime Outcomes. Sociological Theory 11 (1):96-116.
Neve Gordon (2002). On Visibility and Power: An Arendtian Corrective of Foucault. [REVIEW] Human Studies 25 (2):125-145.
Vicente Navarro (1993). Has Socialism Failed? An Analysis of Health Indicators Under Capitalism and Socialism. Science and Society 57 (1):6 - 30.
Brian Seitz (2012). Foucault and the Subject of Stoic Existence. Human Studies 35 (4):539-554.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1996). Being and Power: Heidegger and Foucault. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 4 (1):1 – 16.
Brian Seitz (2004). Sartre, Foucault, and the Subject of Philosophy's Situation. Sartre Studies International 10 (2):92-105.
Andrew Crane, David Knights & Ken Starkey (2008). The Conditions of Our Freedom: Foucault, Organization, and Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):299-320.
Added to index2011-03-02
Total downloads92 ( #10,498 of 1,088,398 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #6,950 of 1,088,398 )
How can I increase my downloads?