David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):45-50 (1990)
ABSTRACT This essay considers a common objection to commercial surrogacy on the grounds that the child is treated as a commodity for sale by the surrogate and the commissioning couple. I analyse one prevalent argument for the view that commercial surrogacy is a kind of baby‐selling, not service‐selling. I conclude that this argument rests on an implausible interpretation of what the reproductive services are. I defend an alternative interpretation of typical surrogacy agreements. Furthermore, I argue that this interpretation fails to support the conclusion that the surrogate is primarily or exclusively selling a baby, rather than her reproductive services. My primary concern is to diagnose a conceptual error in an argument against surrogacy. However, the interpretation of surrogacy arrangements that is defended helps to shift the focus from the issue of whether or not the child is degraded to the issue of whether or not the surrogate degrades herself or is degraded by the commissioning couple
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
B. K. Rothman (1985). The Products of Conception: The Social Context of Reproductive Choices. Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (4):188-195.
Lori B. Andrews (1987). The Aftermath of Baby M: Proposed State Laws on Surrogate Motherhood. Hastings Center Report 17 (5):31-40.
W. J. Winslade (1981). Surrogate Mothers: Private Right or Public Wrong? Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (3):153-154.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Karen H. Rothenberg (1988). Baby M, the Surrogacy Contract, and the Health Care Professional: Unanswered Questions. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 16 (1-2):113-120.
Mary B. Mahowald (1991). Surrogacy and the Right to Have a Baby. Social Philosophy Today 6:127-138.
Brenda M. Baker (1996). A Case for Permitting Altruistic Surrogacy. Hypatia 11 (2):34 - 48.
Jennifer A. Parks (2010). Care Ethics and the Global Practice of Commercial Surrogacy. Bioethics 24 (7):333-340.
Amrita Banerjee (2010). Reorienting the Ethics of Transnational Surrogacy as a Feminist Pragmatist. The Pluralist 5 (3):107-127.
Yukari Semba, Chiungfang Chang, Hyunsoo Hong, Minori Kokado, Kaori Muto & Ayako Kamisato (2009). Surrogacy: Donor Conception Regulation in Japan. Bioethics 24 (7):348-357.
Stephen Wilkinson (2003). The Exploitation Argument Against Commercial Surrogacy. Bioethics 17 (2):169–187.
Jason K. M. Hanna (2010). Revisiting Child-Based Objections to Commercial Surrogacy. Bioethics 24 (7):341-347.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads47 ( #85,883 of 1,790,506 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #106,758 of 1,790,506 )
How can I increase my downloads?